Sunday, April 17, 2011

SlutWalk, Victim Blaming, and Why We Say it Anyway.

*Trigger warning*

Great interview at Feministing with Sonya Barnett and Heather Jarvis, co-founders of Toronto SlutWalk, a protest against victim-blaming, which the two women organized after comments made by a Toronto police officer to students at York University.

In the interview Jarvis says,
When the story first broke about a Toronto police officer saying on a York University campus, in a safety forum to the students, that women "should avoid dressing like sluts in order not be victimized," he prefaced it by saying  “I’ve been told I shouldn’t say this” and he said it anyway.
Think such sentiments are rare in the Canadian legal system? This recent article points out,
"On February 18 in a Manitoba court, federally appointed Judge Robert Dewar gave convicted sex offender Kenneth Rhodes a lenient two year, jail-free sentence despite an established precedent for stronger rulings in rape cases. Dewar’s reasoning? Rhode’s twenty year old victim was wearing a tube top, high heels, and makeup (imagine!)... Dewar reasoned that her appearance created “misunderstood signals” that suggested “sex was in the air” and justified her rape (which Dewar chose to call “inconsiderate behaviour”)."
Those inconsiderate women, getting themselves raped. How dare they put us men in that situation.

A police officer in Saanich recently encouraged women to "Travel in groups, stick to well-lit areas, be mindful of your drink, where you leave it, and who you accept a drink from". Very similar to the approach taken by the UBC campus. And again, no similar attempt at advocacy toward people who do the raping.

A woman is raped once every seventeen minutes in this country, according to the black liberal feminazi dyke organization, Statistics Canada.

I'd like to return to the preface of the quote from the Toronto police officer, "I've been told I shouldn't say this". I think that preface is a to-the-letter-perfect example of how far feminism has taken us (especially men) in mainstream culture.

Most men acknowledge there is this thing called violence against women and it's bad. We also acknowledge there was this thing called feminism which was about bra burning (myth) and pay equity (which we still don't have) and the vote, which women have so it's over, they won, and now, in the aftermath of feminism, they nag men on sitcoms (written by white men) and in Judd Apatow films (written by white men) so in fact women aren't just equal now, they in fact have more power than us, right?

I don't mean to be flippant in invoking sitcoms and Judd Apatow. I really believe the modern view of feminism is not manufactured by actual feminism, but by a white male reaction to feminism. Flip through the channels, watch a few commercials and tv shows, and see just how common the nagging bitch trope is. These characters, almost without exception, are conceived by men in a "post-feminist" (hate that word) culture.

Most men acknowledge, on some level, the existence or at least aftermath of feminism as a quiet spectre of women's rights in the backs of our brains. And I have a batshit crazy theory about men that we acknowledge that spectre, JUST ENOUGH, to preface our Paternalism 2011, Protectiveness 2011, Sexism 2011, Victim Blaming 2011, with those magic words,

"I've been told I shouldn't say this".

From what I see in our culture, our media, and in the behaviour of men around me, THAT is how far feminism has taken men. Same sexism as in the 1950's, but with a preface; an acknowledgement that, in our privilege as men, should damned well be enough to keep the angry feminists happy.

During the 2008 US presidential election campaign I was watching MSNBC with my girlfriend at the time, and there was a clip of Rush Limbaugh saying something brutally sexist about Hillary Clinton (something to do with her shedding tears as a sign of her lack of fitness for the presidency). Limbaugh gave this "Hee, I'm about to say this" smirk just before saying what he said. My girlfriend pointed at the screen and said, to paraphrase, "See, that smirk? That's feminism in the mainstream, right there. Same sexism, but with a smirk".

I see that smirk, that "I've been told I shouldn't say this," every time I see a man make a sexist comment, or a sexist joke. Feminism is in the minds of men in 2011. The feminists of the 1870's and 1970's won, insofar as we now defiantly preface the same sexism we used in the 1860's and 1960's, and we treat that defiance as gentlemanly acknowledgement. It ain't.

Fun fact time: The term, "Feminazi" was coined by Rush Limbaugh. Pink is pigeonholed as the feminine colour thanks to Adolph Hitler. And women are nagging bitches who nag men for no reason that isn't pathological because white male sitcom writers tell us so. Funny how the richest, whitest, assholest men seem to shape our view of how womanhood plays out.

But back to "I've been told I shouldn't say this" as a tool for victim blaming. I think it's important to put what the Toronto police officer said in a perspective of Canada's recent judicial history as far as sexual assault is concerned, because then we will see not just how little we've progressed, but how small and how recent our timeline of progression has been.

Consent was not legally defined in this country until 1993. "She was drunk, your honour" was accepted as a LEGAL DEFENSE in sexual assault cases in this country until 1995. Medical and psychiatric files of sexual abuse victims were not legally restricted until 1999. A man could legally, LEGALLY, rape his spouse until 1983. To put it in perspective, Britain criminalized marital rape in 1960, 23 years before we did.

With our legal system only very recently waking up with regard to sexual assault, it's not much of a surprise to see current police officers and judges not yet having gotten the wake up call. You know what helps wake them up? People like Sonya Barnett and Heather Jarvis. Events like Toronto SlutWalk.

Canada has not only a brutal history, or a brutal recent history, but a brutal present history, of sexual assault, and the police and judicial system of this country are out of touch with where sexual assault happens and who perpetrates it. Sexual assaults rarely occur in the isolated, dark areas from which the police think they need to protect women. 67% of sexual assaults in Canada occur in the home of the victim or the perpetrator. Contrary to the police's image of a typical rapist as a random, isolated man waiting in a dark alley, in 78% of reported cases of rape, the victim knew the attacker. The miniskirt-as-invitation-to-rape is a myth that keeps us safe from the reality that in a culture that glorifies male dominance, demonizes male empathy, objectifies women's bodies, fears the sexual agency of women, and conflates power and violence with sexuality, rape is going to be inviting and frequent and even the nice guys are a "just a few more seconds, honey" from not taking in a "no" or the body lanuage of a "no". Rape happens with real people in real relationships.

98% of attackers are men, and yet some of us guys want so badly to believe the attacker ratio is closer to 50-50. False reports in Canada account for 2-3% of reported sexual assault cases in Canada, about the same percentage as for murders and burglaries, yet a lot of us guys want so badly to believe the false report to true report ratio is about 50-50. It ain't. We do the raping, and they seldom lie about it. Want to be part of the solution? March with our sisters in Vancouver SlutWalk. (Article by Jarrah from Gender Focus)

This country's judicial system makes victim blaming not just an incidence of conversational assholeism, but legal policy that gets rapists off the hook, and makes women a whole let less likely to report an act society has deemed reprehensible enough to be illegal. Let me put it this way: If you victim blame in the presence of someone you care about, you make it less likely that they will report an assault. Your privilege of blaming the victim, not having been one yourself, silences women.

If you break into a house in this country you will serve more time than if you break into a woman (EDIT: Apologies for that image, and the troublesome comparison of women to property...There's an example of the insensitivity privilege affords me). Two years is about the average sentence. We have a serial rapist here in Vancouver who has assaulted dozens upon dozens of women, mostly native. He has killed two of them. Still at large.

How much "I don't want to believe this" have you felt reading this post so far? I've done the research and if you do as well, you'll see the stories, you'll see the statistics, with other similar and corroborating statistics if you still aren't convinced.

Still feel like victim-blaming? Still think if a woman wears a miniskirt she's inviting it, just a little? If you do, you have something in common with the good people of this country who arrest and prosecute rapists.

I have a challenge to men:

Examine when you do or say something like, "I've been told I shouldn't say this". Examine who has told you that, why you have been told that, and what the effect your words or actions might have in light of your having to employ such a preface. Stop allowing yourself the privilege of such prefaces by patting yourself on the back for being a post-feminist, gentle, sensitive "90's man," because that's just another paradigm for an unattainable "ideal masculinity", and another way for us not to question our own behaviour. Examine when other people use such a preface. Examine how conversational prefaces function. If you have to say "This might offend someone," maybe there's a reason you shouldn't have thought it in the first place.

I have victim blamed, in a previous relationship. I once made the assertion that a woman wearing a miniskirt was more likely to get raped (which isn't even statistically true), and it was not easy for my girlfriend to hear. She was shocked, upset, appalled, that I, who identified as a feminist at that point, could be so ignorant. Point being, if a guy with a feminist blog who engages in feminism daily and tries to live a feminist life is capable of such sexism, then guys with and without feminist blogs, you probably are too.

So think before you victim blame. And march with me in Vancouver's SlutWalk this May. SlutWalk is getting talked about, it's inspiring young people, and it's a real tool for changing the way victim blamers think.

-Taylor

29 comments:

  1. Thank you. I've been ranting about this myself for a while (I marched in the Toronto SlutWalk and it was an amazing experience), but sadly, my female voice doesn't carry the weight that a privileged male voice does. I hope you don't mind if I re-post the link to this blog- I think people need to read this. Badly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. thank u -- now we also need to work on the women who have bought into this and change their thinking and speaking.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really enjoyed this blogpost. I am doing an applied critical analysis of the SlutWalk cause for my Social Movements and Media class and I found the perspective of the male feminist voice very helpful. I hope you continue blogging on feminist issues. Feminism has received a negative connotation due to media as "man haters" having it clear that feminism is for everyone, not just women is important if things are going to change.

    :-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. @ Death-Rae: I'd be honoured if you reposted a link to my blog. I read your "Made for Walking" post on your blog and I absolutely loved it. Mind if I link to it here?

    I have to believe that if the root problem in all this is women's voices not being heard, the root answer lies in women's voices being heard, Loudly and Often. Men can help, absolutely we can, by learning to co-operate and listen rather than lead and dominate, but a response to misogyny that doesn't involve a primarily female voice, is, I think, solving patriarchy with more patriarchy.

    My way of saying, I like feminism to be radical. I think your voice does carry weight, especially when it is combined with Jarvis and Barnett and every woman (and man) who participated in SlutWalk. I think we're finally seeing some coherent responses to victim blaming in our mainstream media since the incident at York. (Like this one: http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/article/948827--a-new-form-of-victim-blaming-in-rapes)

    Can't wait for Vancouver's march!

    Also, if you feel like reading another male feminist-ally, here's a great blog: http://hugoschwyzer.net/ -- Schwyzer is a women's studies prof, and is awesome. Love his weighing in on the French burqua ban.

    Thanks so much for commenting!

    ReplyDelete
  5. @ cheryl: I totally agree. This might have to be more of a women-to-women interaction, as I feel weird about telling women they've been duped, but on the other hand, I overheard a victim-blaming conversation between my roommate and her friend during the Super Bowl re: Ben Rothelisberger, and I just had to jump in and correct some misleading information. I'm glad I did, because it opened their minds about the issue. I haven't really decided how much I, as a man, want to intervene in situations like that.

    ReplyDelete
  6. @ L. Pandora: Thanks! Really glad you found my perspective helpful. I think men can do a lot of work to dispel the negative image of feminism to other men, because it's so easy to point out how much the modern image of feminism has been manufactured *by* men.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @ L. Pandora: Also, I'd love to hear more about your critical analysis -- keep us posted!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Terrific stuff. Right there with you as a father to a daughter and a loving husband to a strong woman and a teacher to many young feminists.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Nice post, T! Well-written, passionate argument. It's good to have some male feminists helping out us "Feminazis". Thanks for the link back to my Observer piece, too :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Found this through a link from SlutWalkTO, and I am so glad I read it. As a survivor and as a woman I thank you for this piece.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I saw a lot of this sort of "she was asking for it" rhetoric passed around when I briefly attended York University. They had huge problems with security out there, partly stemming from the fact that York is basically a school somebody air-dropped into a field, and partly stemming from the administration's failure to curb the prevalence of on-campus drinking (miniskirts don't contribute to rape, but I'm willing to bet a drunk girl stumbling back to her dorm is a more tempting target than a sober one) particularly of the underage variety. One of the myriad reasons I left.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thank you for writing this. Without men, 47% of the earth's population, we just won't be able to make the changes we NEED and DESERVE. Thanks again! Posting this to FB :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. @ Hugo: I might be kinda totally starstruck that you commented on my blog. Thanks, Hugo! The honesty of your “Stop before you become the ‘dirty old man'" post was inspiring to me, in that it helped make my own approach to feminism a lot more introspective and honest.

    @ Jarrah: I fully just googled "Vancouver SlutWalk" and there your Observer article was. I said to myself "Defs gotta link this". :D

    @ Bex: You're very welcome, and thank you too.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thank you so much for this brilliantly articulated message!

    ReplyDelete
  15. @ Alex: I had wondered about York's security levels after reading about this recent gay bashing (http://workersoutlook.blogspot.com/2011/04/mainstream-press-university-downplay.html). It's too bad there is so much "she was asking for it" rhetoric on that campus, as there seems to be over in this neck of the woods at UBC.

    I would point out that in some fraternity cultures women who are less "obvious" targets i.e. sober, rich, not dressing revealingly, are discussed as being *more* desirable than their stumblingly drunk counterparts. An example of such a culture would be the USC Kappa Sigma chapter and their "women as targets" memo I blogged about last month. Drunk or sober, though, most rapes occur in relationships between people who know each other, and I think that should be the primary focus if we're ever going to to examine for *ourselves* when the line between consent and non-consent has been blurry for us.

    (I hope I don't come off as accusing you of apologism because it's not *at all* my intent to do so, I just think even the most aware of us aren't always a hundred percent mindful of how communication about consent can get fuzzy, coercive or dangerous in a sexual moment, so I like to encourage focus on rape in real relationships rather than the scary and often misleading stuff we're always warned about, y'know?)

    Thanks for the comment! I hope your schooling options have improved since then. :)

    ReplyDelete
  16. @ Anonymous 1: Thanks for the FB plug! Always appreciated. :)

    @ Anonymous 2: And thanks to you as well!

    ReplyDelete
  17. I agree with the general idea of the article, but I think you should really stay more to the point of the first cop's ridiculous statement and the fact that our courts would actually reduce a sentance based on that crap...
    Sit-coms are stereo-type shows...how many men are portrayed as jocks? or horny slobs? or asians as good at math or black people who are great at basketball and dancing...? its low brow humor...suggesting that women shouldnt be subject to fun-poking like everyone else is nuts...
    also the thing that 2nd cop said about 'stay in groups watch your drink blablabla...' sounded like something my mother would say....maybe statistically this isnt the best way to avoid rape...but its really not that bad hearted advice anyways...
    What the first guy said is completely nuts...and that an actual court where they essentially say 'a women dressing in X manner has somehow incited rape upon herself, and as such a lighter punishment is in order' this is the truely disgusting occurrence...this shows that the view goes greatly beyond one stupid cop, and into the legal system...
    These are the real issues here, i only say this because i fear talking about sit-coms in particular greatly takes away from the gravity of this article.
    i practice victim blaming, but I blame for the fact that their is an incredibly low percentage of rapes that occur that are ever actually reported....I've heard of girls who are friends with people who they claim raped them....report it...i understand it is difficult and things like that...but every woman in that march who has been raped needs to go report it...its the only way these crimes can begin to be solved

    ReplyDelete
  18. Loving this post. So pleased to have discovered your blog!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Thanks Ally! I like how both our blog titles are responses to other people's messed up responses to feminism, in the vein of Bitch, Jezebel, etc.

    And the Wednesday Addams image is great. I dressed up as her for Halloween and gave trolley tours last year. True story. She is one of my feminist heroes.

    ReplyDelete
  20. @ Anonymous 3: It might have been an argumentatively sharper choice, and one I might have taken had I known this one post would get 13 times the viewership of anything I'd written up to this point. My blog has been a series of rants that go kinda wherevs up until now, but still, a good point. :)

    I don't suggest we shouldn't make fun of women, I suggest that reinforcement of the "nagging bitch" trope is a way some men manufacture the modern, misleading image of feminism. It's something I'll go into more on later posts, but again you're right in saying the focus should be on victim blaming affecting our legal system.

    Your last paragraph is well-intentioned, but a very problematic way of helping rape victims, and a tactic that will never be used on a crisis line that knows what it's doing. It's HARD to report because of so many factors -- shame, disbelief, fear of the partner, fear of reaction from friends and family who don't believe the victim, and reaction from the media and legal system which often sides against the victim. I understand your wish is for victims to be empowered, but telling the women in that march who have been raped what is good for them isn't going to help. The march itself will help, though, because it gets women not just closer to being able to speak up, but also closer to a reality where they are actually heard when they do speak.

    ReplyDelete
  21. You fucking rock.

    ReplyDelete
  22. @ Anonymous 4: Thanks so much. I was very stressed from a difficult conversation I was having on Facebook with a fellow who was saying some harsh things about victims in response to my blog, and your comment gave me the pick me up that I needed. Seriously, I super appreciate that. :)

    ReplyDelete
  23. Excellent post, very well written and so refreshing. I will be blogging about it on my own site, and adding a link to spread the word. Keep writing! :)

    ReplyDelete
  24. Thanks so much Candz, for spreading the word and for your comment! I'm really looking forward to looking at your site on sex ed when(/if, let's hope) I finally get a break from work today. :D I'm very optimistic that better, more honest, more inclusive sex education is a real opportunity for changing the way we think about sex, consent, and victimization.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Taylor, thanks! I completely agree with you -- and I am constantly advocating for the kind of sexuality and sexual health education that we need -- our young people in particular. Let me know what you think of my site and the blog post linking to yours. :)

    ReplyDelete
  26. I really enjoyed your blog. I was interested to hear that you were guilty of victim of blaming even when you claimed yourself a feminist. I would be interested in your views about men that claim and appear to be feminist to their general friends but in their romantic relationships are actually abusive?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Thank you for this post. I look forward to reading more of your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Thanks Patricia! And to Anon 5, your comment inspired my new post. :D

    ReplyDelete
  29. LOVE your site, Candice. Really appreciate how you poke holes in the logic of abstinence-only education without dismissing abstinence as a personal choice, and appreciate even more your inclusiveness of all sexualities. Defs linking to your site on my blog. :)

    ReplyDelete